29 Nov 2009

Mariah Carey - Obsessed





I was like, why are you so obsessed with me?

So Oh Oh So Ohhh
Will the real MC please step to the mic?
MC- You need an MC, place to be
MC the MC

All up in the blogs
Say we met at the bar
When I don’t even know who you are
Say we up in your house
Sayin’ I’m up in your car
But you in LA and I’m out at Jermaine’s

I’m up in the A- you’re so so lame
And no on here even mentions your name
It must be the weed, it must be the E
Cuz you be poppin, hood, you get it poppin’

Ooh boy why you so obsessed with me?
Boy I want to know- lyin’ that you’re sexin me
When everybody knows it’s clear that you’re upset with me
Ohh finally found a girl that you couldn’t impress
Last man on the earth- still couldn’t get this

You’re delusional, you’re delusional
Boy you’re losing your mind
It’s confusin yo, you’re confused you know
Why you wasting your time?
Got you all fired up with your Napoleon complex
See right through you like you’re bathin’ in windex
[ Mariah Carey Lyrics are found on www.songlyrics.com ]

Ooh Ohh Ohh boy why you so obsessed with me?
And all the ladies sing, all the girls sing
Soo Oohhhh Soo Oohh Obsessed

You on your job, you hatin’ hard
Ain’t gon feed you, I'ma’ let you starve
Graspin’ for air I’m ventilation
You out of breath, hope you ain’t waitin
Tellin’ the world how much you miss me
But we never were so why you trippin’
You a mom and pop, I’m a corporation
I’m the press conference, you a conversation

Ooh boy why you so obsessed with me?
Boy I want to know- lyin’ that you’re sexin me
When everybody knows it’s clear that you’re upset with me
Ohh finally found a girl that you couldn’t impress
Last man on the earth- still couldn’t get this

You’re delusional, you’re delusional
Boy you’re losing your mind
It’s confusin yo, you’re confused you know
Why you wasting your time?
Got you all fired up with your Napoleon complex
See right through you like you’re bathin’ in windex

Ooh Ohh Ohh boy why you so obsessed with me?
And all the ladies sing, all the girls sing
Soo Oohhhh Soo Oohh Obsessed

^O^

张五常: 不要幻想经济学帮你赚钱-

加拿大 Yi 问:

身为一个经济学教授,您认为经济学对我们的生活有何帮助?


答Yi:


千万不要幻想经济学可以给你带来财富。我没有遇到一个大富人家是曾经研究经济的。学经济,对小康或多一点有助,但同样花那么多时间作学问投资,收入的回报经济学只是差强人意。从经济学中的利息理论变化出来的金融学,今天的打工收入最高。是教人投资的职业,很有点尴尬,因为那些职业金融专家自己的投资命中率,一般比不上我已故的不识字的母亲。听说风水先生是不能替自己看风水的。



我走的经济学的路只是解释世事,别无其它。是非常有趣的学问,对脑子的操练有大助焉。但我是幸运的,因为初出道时就有了终生雇用合约,没有被任何人强迫发表。一起笔就升到正教授,从来不需要为争取加薪而写文章。这样的经济学职业,七十年代起不复存在了。纯为解释世事而学问,可以满足自己的好奇心,收入不错,工作时间完全由自己决定,虽然要拼搏,往往苦不堪言,但整体来说自由自在,有不枉此生之感。



真的有解释力的经济学问,在市场值钱吗?大学之外很难说。不少公司曾经邀请我作董事,但那是看名头,不是看学问,一般推却。专栏文章可以卖点钱,但恐怕那是因为我的兴趣广泛,可以无所不谈,读者认为过瘾。



应该是很值钱的——应该富可敌国(一笑)——是我对经济制度运作的理解。是深入的理解,所到之处前无古人(一笑),但我要向谁收钱呢﹖不少朋友认为我对中国的经济改革有贡献(一笑),如果是真的话,那么在中国的经济增长中抽小半个佣,也富绝地球矣(最后一笑)。但一分钱也没有收过,天下能不为区区在下而同声一哭乎?



写到这里,悲从中来,不由得想到明人徐渭的一首诗:



「半生落魄已成翁,独立书斋啸晚风。笔底明珠无处卖,闲拋闲掷野藤中。」




^O^

21 Nov 2009

张五常: 闭关自守也无妨!

(2009.09.22)闭关自守也无妨!(2009-09-22 08:02:54)

标签:张五常 轮胎特保案 财经

分类:五常谈经济

去年奥巴马竞选总统提名时,说如果他获任总统,会杜绝中国的玩具进口美国。据说不安全是原因。后来他认说错,有歉意。(想深一层,美国本土的玩具工业早就移师中国及工资较低的国家,去如黄鹤,没有什么可以「保」的。)最近九月十一日美国宣布对中国轮胎征收惩罚性的进口税,三年加三次,每次加得厉害,得到奥巴马批准。奥氏之前,布殊执政时,美国的压力团体多次提出对中国货进口征收惩罚税,据说有六项通过有关当局,皆被布殊否决。



有一个严重问题。这次在惩罚中国轮胎进口的言论中,没有提到像玩具那样,被指有危险成分。中国制造的轮胎显然被认为是安全的,只是价格相宜,导致美国的轮胎工人失业,所以要惩而罚之。既不危险,也非倾销,只是价格过低。这样,将来反对中国制造品廉价进口的声浪会不绝于耳,奥巴马不容易厚此薄彼,轮胎的命运会成为保护主义卷土重来的先驱。不可能是美国消费者的选择。



重罚中国轮胎进口,美国还存在的轮胎制造商会得益,但没有谁会在那里兴建轮胎工厂。这是因为惩罚关税这回事,既可来,也可去,设厂造轮胎是蠢行为。其它发展中国家呢?大量产出轮胎,廉价输美,也会同样地遇到惩罚关税,所以也不会那样傻,见到自己的国家还没有被点名就赶着去设厂产出轮胎了。如此类推,明智的发展中国家的投资者,会选择不走廉价输出美国的路,转而谋求发展中国家之间的互相贸易,地球一体化会变为地球两体化。



上述是我持有的水晶球的看法,可能想象力过高,但逻辑是对的。中国可以报复(retaliate)吗?当然可以,而纵观今天中国持有的筹码,容易。我反对。曾经说过,无论外间怎样惩罚中国货进口,北京的朋友不要采取任何报复行动。协商不成,他们要惩罚,一笑置之是上策。何况今天遇上金融危机,此报复也,将会导致保护主义地球化,对中国半点好处也没有。是的,协商不成,北京的朋友要逆来顺受。尤其是,我认为中国的经济发展到今天,就是被迫要闭关自守,有得守,守得云开见月明。



我要从史密斯的《国富论》起笔的制针工厂说起,向北京的朋友解释一下简单的分析。史前辈的制针工厂,因为工人分工合作,每人的平均产量,比独自操作的产量高出数百倍。我曾经指出,因为专业而分工合作,其产量可以容易地上升逾万倍。这是史前辈指出的「国富」的主要原因。他跟着翻来覆去地指出,要鼓励专业分工产出,市场贸易不可或缺,因为没有市场无从专业。这就带来史前辈的一个重要格言:「专业产出的限度是由市场的广阔度决定的 (Specialization is limited by the extent of the market) 。」



这里我要用一些真实的数据来示范市场广阔度对生产成本的重要决定性。二○○一年为了写《供应的行为》的第三章──《生产的成本》,我要求一家印制商提供印制书籍的成本数字,由花千树的叶海旋核对,说明一分也不能错。是一本三十二开内文一百九十二页的平装书,以港币算,时间是二○○一年七月。众所周知,印制书籍是量愈大平均成本愈低。我获得的数据,印制五百本的平均成本是每本五十七元二毫九分,八千本的平均成本是七元五毫三分。资料显示,开头平均成本跌得急,到了八千本就跌得远为轻微。当时我算过,考虑到仓库的租金,无限量的不急销售,以香港而言,每次印制八千本最着数。



在香港要出书过瘾一下的君子们知道,因为市场小,要销售五百本不容易。二○○一年的市价,内文一百九十二页的书每本约四十五元,批发六折,是二十七元。没有算进编辑、设计费用,五百本的平均成本五十七元多,要过瘾不能不入肉伤身。要真的过瘾,二千本(印制成本平均约十七元)是起码的要求了。



市场销量够大是利用专业分工产出而减低成本的主要法门,也因为这法门的存在,基于私有产权的经济就可以夸夸其谈了。印制书籍是量愈大产出平均成本愈低的一个好例子,可能有点夸张,但我们不难想出更夸张的其它实例。权利有了清楚的界定(所谓私产)是市场运作的先决条件。这是科斯定律。但有私产,市场的销量不足,算你是绝顶天才也只能大叹倒霉了。



神州大地的人口比香港的高出二百倍。要出书过瘾一下吗?国内今天的书价比香港的大约低一半,成本也大约低一半,销售二千本当然远不及香港那么困难。书籍如是,其它产品也如是。外间多购中国货是扩大市场,有助,但自己既然有那么大的市场,他们要保护什么的,让他们保到够算了。不容易明白,美国在消费指数一蹶不振的今天,他们会推出保护主义。难道轮胎之价大幅提升,那里的市民会多购汽车吗?是湛深的学问,我不懂。



美国推出保护主义,对中国当然不利。但此不利也,在发展得有头有势的神州大地来说,因为本身的市场够大,用不着哭出来。报复还击,怎样算我也算不出对中国本身有好效果。中国的劳苦大众拼搏了那么多年,站稳了脚,让他们享受一下外间的名牌贵货不是很好吗?索性取消所有进口关税吧!是站起来表演一下真功夫的时候了。



我曾经指出,中国要大事发展的是内供,而不是内需。只要内供发展得好——主要是撤销所有约束内供的管制——内需的威力会随之而来。外需无疑有助,但今天看已经不是炎黄子孙的生存命脉了。一个人口不多的小国,要靠出口换饭吃,或靠开赌,或靠旅游,或靠碰中了些什么天然矿物。但中国不是小国,人口多而又吃得苦,市场大得惊人,而工业的确是发展起来了。人家要保护,中国在不利中可以稳守,而长此下去,最大的输家一定是推出保护的那一方,因为在保护中市民是买贵了货,资源的使用也被误导了。日本保护农产品的经验是灾难性的。



我感到惋惜的,是美国惩罚中国的轮胎进口,在过渡期间中国的轮胎制造商会受到损害。中国自动提升出口税会打上交叉,也会与目前的出口税制有冲突。自动约束出口量是配额制度,麻烦多多,纺织品的前车可不鉴乎?然而,轮胎出口配额会减少甚至弥补制造商的财政损失,而更重要是会大幅提升出口轮胎的质量。如果美国可以接受这配额而放弃惩罚税,对中国来说是比较上算的。我可以保证,如果惩罚税换作配额制,而商务部懂得容许配额以市价自由转让,中国产出的轮胎的质量会冠绝天下。这是价格理论的推断,其准确性与牛顿推断树上的苹果会掉到地上相若。




^O^

周小川:利率过低影响金融机构服务实体经济

周小川:利率过低影响金融机构服务实体经济


时间2009-11-20 10:57来源和讯


中国人民银行行长周小川11月20日参加2009全球CEO年会,并发表演讲,以下为演讲全文:

  周小川:各位与会代表大家好!受中国企业联合会和《商业周刊》邀请参加今天的CEO论坛。

  选一个什么题目给大家讲一讲,考虑了一下觉得还应该是金融界怎么为实体经济做好服务。金融危机以来,大家在对抗金融危机的政策制定过程中会观察到有不同的现象,有的地方财政当局和货币当局向金融体系注入了大量的资金,但是资金没有非常有效地来支持实体经济的发展。因此,大家可能比较担心就业和其他方面所产生的问题。

中国也是非常关心这件事情的,出现的情况稍微有些不一样,今年的信贷总额增长是非常快的,应该说有效地支持了实体经济的发展。如何能够进一步探讨这方面的制度和政策原因,我讲三点:

  第一,金融体系能否更好地为实体经济服务,一个关键因素是金融机构自己本身的健康性。

  金融机构如果在危机中自己生了重病,就会住医院治疗,修复自己的资产负债表,考虑怎么充实自己的资本金,怎么能够消化自己的有毒资产。在这种情况下,对实体经济支持的考虑就有可能受到影响,自己的能量也可能受到影响。因此首先要保持金融经济的健康性,有几个方面是最重要的。

  1、资本。金融危机的出现都是消耗资本的,资本没有了,根据健康性的标准和监管的标准都不能更好地为实体经济服务。

  2、有毒资产(不良资产)。不良资产在危机期间肯定会比较明显地上升,同时也在消耗资本。

  3、杠杆率,也就是融资的方式。在正常情况下和在危机的情况下,融资的条件是不一样的。

  像人一样,健康的问题都是有周期性变化的,很多人都是隔几年会生一次病,或者10年会生一场病,很难事先做到预防。中国有一个好处,亚洲金融危机期间我们的金融体系是受到了重挫的,有大量的信托投资公司、信用社、中小金融机构关门倒闭。大家都记得,当年比较出名的广国投的关闭,粤海的充足,在那个时间花了很大精力解决健康性问题。

  从商业银行的角度来看,不良资产正式宣布的数在亚洲金融危机期间是25%,已经非常高了,实际比这个数还高,因为当时还有标准的问题,比如贷款分类标准和会计标准的执行问题。我们有一个好处在亚洲金融风波刚刚开始恢复的时候,启动了一轮注资和股份化制改革,改善公司结构。这一轮改革之后我们遇到了这次全球金融危机,正好中国大型金融机构资本金是充足的。加上这几年经济发展比较好,从健康的角度来看是有能力继续向实体经济提供有效服务的,同时没有出现太大的拖后腿的现象。

  大家还要保持警惕,这一轮问题很好,这一轮情况好,并不意味着以后就安全了,就像人一样,以后还是会得病的,得病的原因之一有时是放松了警惕,对自己的健康考虑不周到,也容易生病。

  第二,有关央行的政策制定。

  对于金融社会来讲,要保持金融系统向实体经济提供服务的压力和动力。从压力情况来讲,一方面是竞争,竞争就会产生压力,除了竞争之外还也价格。这次危机过程中我们也观察到利率,特别是存款利率过低或者将近零利率有时就会减少金融机构向实体经济进行服务的压力。我们在危机最开始的时候发现有一些金融机构囤积现金,主要原因是因为解决区域杠杆化的问题,可能资金来源不可靠,别人不再提供或者不给他融资,尽管现金的成本可能是高的,但有很多金融机构有囤积现金的现象。

  之后宏观调控当局向金融市场投入了大量的流动性,还有囤积现金的现象,也就是手里有大量的流动性的资金,但与此同时也非常谨慎地向实体经济放贷和提供融资。里面有多种多样的原因,其中一个原因是负债方的利率太低,囤积也不会占用太多资源,不放出去压力也不大。针对中国我们也考虑到这样的现象,存款利率已经降到2%,再降下去究竟对金融体系是好还是不好。活期存款已经很低了,金融市场短期拆借利率也很低,但定期存款一年期还在2%左右。这当然也有好处,金融机构拿到了存款就一定要考虑用出去,因为要付2%给储户,这样就有压力,一定想办法把资金运用出去。这就使得金融机构能够看到为实体经济服务的时候得到收入、得到利润,能够充实自己,在利差方面还要保持一定的水平。特别是对于发展中国家来说,由于整个经济体系中产生不良资产的机会还是比较多的,有时市场还不成熟,银行体系需要有一定的利差,使得它为实体经济服务的时候自己也能够得到加强。

  这一点通过股份制改革、公司治理的改革得到了加强,商业性金融机构都有相当强的获取利润的动机。首先考虑股东利益,因为现在都是股份制的公司,要考虑为故都创造利润。其次考虑自己的持续性。因为随着资产不断增长,必须不断地补充自己的资本金,相当一部分来自于自己本身创造的利润。再次考虑在这样的过程中要增强拨备,对风险的应对。所有这些通过上一轮的改革都有助于他们持有强烈的利润方面的动力,这个动力也和利率政策的制定使得他们保持在这方面的动力有关系。考虑他们和实体经济之间的关系,把资金运用出去就会获得好处。

  相反来说,如果利差过小,国际上有一些金融机构,机构内部部门之间的关系会发生变化。可能大家觉得信贷赚钱太少没意思,还是交易部门赚钱,人也不多,结果交易部门膨胀的很厉害,信贷部门处于萎缩的状态。这就需要我们考虑在金融市场的结构上、政策上等各个方面如何保持金融部门向实体经济服务的压力和动力以及其中还有的价格机制。

  第三,这一轮中国克服金融危机一个重要的口号是扩大内需。

  扩大内需有什么特点,我们有鼓励小排量汽车的政策,有家电下乡的政策,各种各样的政策使得制造业能够不至于明显地下滑。可能大家还需要观察更多的内容。

  首先和我们之前遇到的困难时期不太一样,比如亚洲金融危机时期,很多人感觉到流动资金紧缺,这一轮中国的政府对危机的响应非常快,很快就发出了大量的流动资金,特别是商业票据,这样基本上缓解了在生产过程中流动资金的需求,也对中小企业比较有利。扩大内需必须有最终需求,最终需求无非是投资、最终消费、净出口。在这几项里,中国在最终消费上还是取得了很大的进展,但在投资方面必须小心,因为中国在某些方面已经有产能过剩的现象,特别是在一些常规的制造业中。基础设施投资中也有一些人在担心有些基础设施是非常必要的,但也有一些基础设施,比如某些公路,虽然从长远来看是有必要的,但投资太早会出现没有车流量的问题,也有类似于产能过剩的问题。所以我们必须在投资方面找到新的增长点。

  从今年前三季度的情况看,中国城镇化的过程产生了大量的投资需求,城镇化的过程是中国所特有的,中国有几亿农业劳动力,还要随着农业生产力的提高不断减少,会有更多人到城里,到城里就需要有住房、需要有公共设施,需要城镇改善环境,需要扩大城镇范围。因此就代理了城镇扩大城市内部基础设施的需求,城市内部公用设施的需求,城市社会事业包括医院、学校等等需求,相比较之下最大的还是住房的需求。今年中国克服金融危机的过程中,这个需求表现的比较明显,我们也在密切关注。

  一方面有它的必然性,另外一方面也有它的好处。必然性是中国处于城镇化的发展阶段,好处是这个投资是有实际需要的,不是太超前,是符合当前阶段发展的,不是浪费的,也不会导致产能过剩。但有有难处的地方,一部分城镇化的公用和社会设施方面不一定有充足的自身项目的效益,有一些是有效益的,但也是依靠了财政性的还款安排。我们需要在政策上、法律体系上按照有所改进,使得它得以顺利进展。现在有一些做法,比如各种形式的融资平台,我个人观察主要有两种方式,一种是以城市政府所拥有的土地做质押换来的融资能力,一种是不是项目本身自身的收费能力,用综合收费能力来保证支持项目的还款能力。一方面城镇化是当前一个正确的方向,也需要金融界给予支持,同时也带来了很多挑战,提出了很多新的问题,解决的不好也可能造成还款能力和不良资产等问题。希望大家能够探讨这些问题,以便我们能更好地做好克服经济危机以及后危机时期的工作。我特别希望各个行业不同的CEO对金融业的服务、对金融业的政策提出批评指正,以便我们改进工作。



^O^

17 Nov 2009

Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping America Great














CNBC TRANSCRIPT: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping America Great
Posted By: Alex Crippen | Executive Producer
cnbc.com | 13 Nov 2009 | 12:09 AM ET
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33901003

This is the unofficial transcript of the CNBC Town Hall event Warren Buffett and Bill Gates: Keeping America Great, taped Thursday, November 12, 2009 at Columbia University in New York City.

It was prepared for CNBC by Realtime Subscription Services.

The transcript is also available for downloading as an Adobe Acrobat PDF document.

ANNOUNCER: The embodiment of the American dream, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, self-made billionaires whose values run as deep as their wealth. One redefined an industry, the other the modern investor. But both put their stock in America, and by investing in business and humanity, reaped the rewards of this great country's capitalist tradition. Today that tradition is under siege, our way of life questioned. And with America at an inflection point, a future generation looks for guidance from the world's two greatest capitalists. Now, they are going back to school, not to learn, but to teach. Showing the next generation of business leaders that wealth is not about the money you amass, but the number of lives you enrich. Tonight in a CNBC town hall event, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates share their secrets to keeping America great.

BECKY QUICK: A special CNBC town hall. I am Becky Quick at Columbia Business School at Columbia University. Let's hear it, guys. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] We are in the heart of New York City. This is the world's center of capitalism and this is the place where dreams really do come true. In fact, right now, look at all these people here today. We could be surrounded -- [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] -- We could be surrounded by the next Warren Buffett or Bill Gates. How about you? You ready to go?

STUDENT: We are so excited to all be here today. You wouldn't believe how much tickets are being sold for out front.

BECKY: I know you're not telling the truth. You had to get in with your I.D., right?

STUDENT: Yes, this is true.

BECKY: We're ready to go tonight. Tonight it is all about Keeping America Great. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]


No people have done that better than Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. Folks, let's please welcome Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

I see Warren is trying to work the home crowd here with Columbia. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

Gentlemen, thank you so much for joining us tonight. This has been, as you know, an extraordinary year. This is a year where the rules have been completely rewritten, where we have thrown out the rule books, and we have seen icons collapse. This is also a time when a lot of people have probably wondered about our way of life. People in this very room. That's going to be our focus in just a minute. Gentlemen, before we get to that, the two of you may seem like an odd pair. For anybody who doesn't know you two well --

BUFFETT: You'll think more odd when we get through. [LAUGHTER]

BECKY: What brings you two together tonight? Why you two and why here with these business students here at Columbia?

WARREN BUFFETT: Well, we enjoy working together. Actually, when I left Columbia, they told me I would probably have to come back and repeat a few classes. So here I am.

BECKY: Bill, what about you? You are ready to go with the students?

BILL GATES: Yeah, it will be a lot of fun. Warren and I love getting the questions and talking about our optimism. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: The reason you two are here tonight is this is a pivotal moment in history. People have questions about the economy, about our entire system of capitalism. And, gentlemen, let me ask each of you, over the course of the last year, was there ever a time that you had doubts about capitalism and about our way of life?

BUFFETT: No, there was not a time. If there had been, last September when we invested a lot of money, that was when the country was looking into the abyss. The money was flowing out of money market funds. The commercial paper market died and everything. We put $8 billion to work in just a matter of a few days then. So I never lost confidence in the system. This country works, you know. We've got 200 years of proof. And it's going to continue to work. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Bill, what do you think, Bill?

GATES: Well, we have a complex financial system which we have proven that we can make mistakes. But more fundamental than that is the innovation, the fact that you can create new companies, that people are willing to take risk and invest, that there's great science going on. This country still has the best universities, the best science, and we're going to tune our system of capitalism, you know. The idea that you have a lot of short-term loans covering long-term needs, the amount of leverage that was there, there are definitely some lessons. But the fundamentals of the system, a marketplace-driven system where we invest in education and a great infrastructure for the long-term, that's continued. And, you know, I'll bet there are some inventions that took place in that fall in the darkest hour: People were working on new drugs, new chips, new robots and things to make life better for everyone in the decades ahead. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: All right. Tonight is all about the students and why don't we start out and get right to it. Why don't you start out. You ready to go?

QUESTION: We are honored to have you here at the university. [APPLAUSE] My question for you is directed to both of you, Mr. Gates and Mr. Buffett. I'd like to know your perspective on whether greed and immoral behavior, unethical behavior, were key causes of the recent financial crisis.


BUFFETT: You went out toward the end, Becky.

BECKY: Just wondering whether greed and corruption were behind what happened.

BUFFETT: It certainly played a part. We have always had greed. That didn't get invented in the last few years. And greed, fear in the third quarter -- I mean, the American people were really panicked there for a while. And it affected their -- it started out on Wall Street but then spilled over into the general economy subsequently. But we're never going to get rid of greed. We're never going to get rid of fear. What we do have is a system, as Bill said, a market system where we have the quality of opportunity and the rule of law combined to unleash human potential in this country over the last couple of hundred years to the degree nobody would have believed possible a few centuries before that. There's nothing that's gone wrong with that system. Our economy was sputtering and still is sputtering some. But we've got the greatest engine ever devised. And it's just beginning. Greed will continue. Don't worry about that. Oliver Stone is putting out a second film here pretty soon. Probably get mentioned again in this one with Gordon Gekko making a return. But that is not what drives the American system. What drives the American system is the quality of opportunity in a market system and the knowledge that when you get out of here, you're going to enjoy the fruits of the knowledge you have gained. And it will keep working. I'd love to trade places with any of you.

BECKY: Bill, do you have any extra thoughts on that?

GATES: Well, the best systems are ones where you have good short-term metrics, great accounting, looking at profits, looking at risk and willing to do things long-term. Investing in new research, letting people build new companies. I was a huge beneficiary of this country's unique willingness to take risk on a young person. And, you know, I got to hire people who were older. I got to sell to people who were older. And it was kind of a dream come true. And that kind of thing is -- other countries have seen it and they are trying to create that same dynamic. And that's good for the world. It's excellent that China and India will borrow our ideas about universities, about entrepreneurship, simplification of business. None of us want to borrow this extreme leverage that we got into. But in a sense, that's kind of a -- I don't want to say minor, but it doesn't speak to the heart of why things have worked so well.

BECKY: All right. Let's get to another question. How about right here?

QUESTION: Hello. My name is Accosia Bagima. I am from the Northern Virginia area and I'm a first-year student here at Columbia. And I want to thank, once again, both of you for coming. It's an honor. My question is directed toward Mr. Gates. Mr. Gates, I know you're not in the finance industry, but can you tell us what you were feeling when you first heard that Lehman was filing for bankruptcy?

GATES: I don't follow investment banks, you know, very closely. So it didn't strike me as fundamentally a terrible thing. In the technology business, the two companies I admired the most, Wang Industries and Digital Equipment, had both basically gone bankrupt. Digital actually got bought. And so the fact that there's these ups and downs, certain firms get knocked out, I didn't have any sentimentality over that particular firm. Now, this knock-on effect where other people had debts to them and those were going to be very hard to settle and that complexity might cause things to freeze up, that I called up Warren and I said, "Should I be worried?" And he said, "A little bit." [LAUGHTER]

BECKY: Warren, was it a mistake for the government to allow Lehman to go under?

BUFFETT: It may have been. But I would say overall, the officials in Washington did a terrific job of dealing with really what was an economic Pearl Harbor, as we talked about. So I would say that if Merrill hadn't been bought by the B of A, Merrill would have gone very quickly. And the dominoes were really lined up. And I don't think it was fully appreciated, perhaps, what a big domino Lehman was or how close it was to the next big dominoes. But overall, I give (former Treasury Secretary Henry) Paulson, I give (Federal Reserve Chairman Ben)Bernanke, I give (FDIC Chairman) Sheila Bair, I give (Treasury Secretary) Tim Geithner, I give them very high marks for the fact they took unprecedented action. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Let's get to another question. Right back here at the microphone. Go ahead.

QUESTION: I hope this works.

BECKY: It does. It sounds like it.

QUESTION: Hi, my name is Greg Letter. I grew up in Ohio and I'm also a current student, obviously. My question was with Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs, this relates to Mr. Buffett, you had the opportunity to invest. I was wondering how you chose to invest in Goldman Sachs and why you chose not to maybe invest in both, or what made you not decide to invest in Lehman Brothers.

BUFFETT: I had more confidence in both the numbers and the management of Goldman Sachs than any other major firm in Wall Street at that time. Now, there could have been things happened that would have made Goldman Sachs be next in line. (Goldman CEO) Roy Blankfein had said I worked 30 seconds behind Morgan Stanley. This is covered very well in the book called "Too Big To Fail" by Andrew Ross Sorken. But I did not think the system was going to go under. I felt Washington in the end would do the right thing. I thought if they did the right thing, Goldman Sachs was -- I thought it was the best-run operation. I thought its figures were the most solid and I thought they would prosper the most in the future ahead. Plus I liked the terms, too. [LAUGHTER]

BECKY: Warren, you said at that time they had the best management and a lot of other things. Did you change your mind since then?

BUFFETT: Pardon me?

BECKY: Have you changed your mind since then? You said at that time they had the best management.

BUFFETT: Goldman, my experience with Goldman goes back to when I met Sidney Weinberg in 1940. I followed the company a long time. They have a discipline around there that I think particularly in their marking to market and all of that, I think probably is the best among the firms in Wall Street. And I thought Roy Blankfein had a very strong appreciation of risk. Now, if the system went down, everybody gets hit. But I felt to a great extent they had factored the best people into the business. So they were my number one choice. I had a few other choices that were offered to me. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Let's get to another question, everybody. Another question.

QUESTION: It's a pleasure to be here with both of you today. My name is John Lemley. I'm originally from Scarsdale, New York. Given the severity of the economic downturn, which some attribute to systemic breakdown in risk allegation and underwriting standards, a fiercely partisan debate has ensued regarding the appropriate role of government. Can this role be positive and if so, how?

BECKY: What do you guys think about big government?

GATES: Well, there's clearly a role for the government in business cycles. And over time, that's been tuned, you know, mistakes have been made. Now, the question is -- and that's largely measured through inflation and interest rates. Now, there's a question of could there be a measure of risk that would cause them to step in and maybe tax transactions, make the bigger firms put more money aside. That is still really a question of whether you can recognize these situations and actually have government play a very positive role. Now, as things start to fall apart, we know there are ways that taking firms that are going down and handling those in a more expedited way -- there's a lot that can be done there. But the basic idea of, can you spot bubbles? Can the government spot bubbles? That's a great question. Some great economists have some ideas. But it is not a proven territory.

BUFFETT: Last September, only the government could have saved things. The whole world wanted to deleverage. And they were deleveraging under conditions of extreme haste and with guns to their head in some cases. And the only entity that could possibly leverage up at the same time that everybody else wanted to deleverage was the Federal government. And when 200 billion flowed out of money market funds in a couple of days, when commercial paper stopped, only the Federal government could act then. And fortunately we had the people there who recognized that and acted promptly. The government has a huge role. And now going forward, it's a very tricky thing to figure out how to prevent excessive leverage and prevent off-balance sheet arrangements from getting in trouble or for just having people at the top of major institutions that run risks they shouldn't be running. But we're wrestling with that right now. There should be more down side to the head of any institution that has to go to the federal government to be saved for reasons of the greater society. And so far, we have been better at carrots and sticks in rewarding CEOs at the top. But I think some more sticks are called for.

BECKY: All right. Let's get to another question. [APPLAUSE]

QUESTION: My name is Brian, first-year student here at Columbia. And I run a business school right now and seems to me a lot of the villains in the full credit crisis were business school graduates. To what extent do you guys think that business schools like Columbia were in some sense responsible for what transpired in the credit crisis?

GATES: Well, remember that capitalism has been massively successful, you know. Standard of life, medicine, all these great things have come out of it. And business schools play a role in training people to think about value, leadership. There's wonderful skills that are taught at great schools like this. And so the fact that, yes, we have had a crisis and we have dropped back, maybe we wasted two or three years net because of the things that were done wrong, that doesn't say that business schools aren't performing a great service, you know. The case studies of this crisis will be taught here for decades to come. And so at least we'll get that benefit out of the pain we went through. Leverage is a very dangerous thing. And perhaps, you know, Warren talked about derivatives as weapons of mass destruction. That wasn't much heeded. And yet at the end of the day, what happened here, particularly in the real estate sector, the notion of risk that price would drop down and what that meant systematically for those instruments, it wasn't well understood. And the mass destruction followed as predicted.

BECKY: Warren, can you teach ethics in a business school? Does it have to come from somewhere else?

BUFFETT: Come back now?

BECKY: Can you teach ethics at a business school?

BUFFETT: Well, I think the best place to learn ethics is in the home. I think most of us get our values from what we see around us before we get to business school. I think that it's important to emphasize them, but I think that if I had a choice of having great education and ethics fully on in the home or as a course in a school later on, I would choose the home. The wonderful thing about it is in this country, is you can succeed magnificently with ethics. It's not a hindrance. It's a help sometimes. It's a neutral sometimes. But it's not a hindrance at all. And to cut corners, you know, everybody here has a wonderful future. I mean, this is an economy you're going into that is so much -- [APPLAUSE] If you look back on the 19th Century, we had seven great bank panics. If you look back at the 20th Century, we had the Great Depression and world wars and flu epidemics. This country doesn't avoid problems. It just solves them. And in the next 100 years, our machine will sputter again, you know. Maybe 15 years will be so-so years, but there will be 85 great years. And during the 20th Century the Dow went from 66 to 11,400, so this is fertile soil that you're working in and there's no reasons to cut corners.

BECKY: All right. Let's get another question. [APPLAUSE]

QUESTION: Hi. My name is Katrina Gankena, and I was born in Russia. And I'm a second-year student at Columbia Business School. My question is for Mr. Gates. What industry do you think is going to produce the next Bill Gates? Because that's the industry I want to get a job in. [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE]

GATES: Industries do have different paces of innovation. So the IT industry, driven by the magic of software, the magic of the optic fiber, magic of the chip which doubles in power every couple of years, it's been the industry that has not only been the most exciting, it's also changed the rules for many other industries. The idea of information being available, what the online world is like, that's incredible. I'll tell you, there are a few other industries that will compete for being exciting in the decades ahead. The energy business, some approach will provide cheaper energy that's environmentally friendly. And there's a lot of science, a lot of business. That's a global thing. There will be some great careers there. Medicine, you know. We haven't solved Parkinson's or Alzheimer's or about 20 diseases of these poor countries, and yet we can be sure that we're on track to do that. And so those three industries I think you would do great in. There's many others, but those are the ones that have the strongest appeal to me.

BUFFETT: Find what turns you on. Find what you have a passion for. If somebody said to me when I was getting out of Columbia, you know, that Bill's business was going to be the one that would be exciting, you know, I don't think I'd have done so well. [LAUGHTER] But I knew what turned me on. I had a professor, Ben Graham, I offered to go to work for him for nothing. He said, "You're overpriced." Nonetheless, I went into the business. [APPLAUSE] I will guarantee, you will do well at whatever turns you on. There's no question about that. Don't let anybody else tell you what to do. You figure out what you are doing. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: All right. We actually got the chance to poll these students. And we asked them if there would ever be a company as transformative as Microsoft in their lifetime. You might be surprised at their response. We will tell you right after this break.


BECKY: Welcome back to CNBC's town hall. We are with Bill Gates and Warren Buffett at the Columbia School of Business at Columbia University. We're in the heart of New York City. And before we went to that break, we asked one of our students -- one of our students actually asked, which industry is going to be producing the next Bill Gates. Now, as we mentioned, we got the chance to take a poll of the students in this room and we asked them if they thought they would ever see a company as transformative as Microsoft in their lifetimes again. Gentlemen, eight out of 10 said yes. That's 80% saying yes, they do think this will be another issue. You guys are a very enthusiastic bunch. Bill, do you share that sense of optimism?

GATES: Absolutely. Capitalism is great and having thousands of things going on in parallel. And a lot of them fail. Some are just mediocre. But the ones that are special can grow and, you know, stun everybody. And in all those fields I mentioned, there is going to be several companies that kind of take your breath away.

BECKY: All right. Let's get to another student question. [APPLAUSE]

QUESTION: Hi, my name is Lisa Williams. I'm from South Orange, New Jersey. I'm currently a first-year at the MBA program. Glad to have you both here. My question is actually for Mr. Buffett. There has been a lost of discussion around the true drivers with the recent deal with Burlington Northern . I was wondering if you could share with us your key motivation for wanting to increase exposure to the railroad sector at this time.

BUFFETT: You know, when I was six, I wanted a railroad set and my dad didn't get it. [APPLAUSE] You think about it. The railroads are tied to the future prosperity of this country. You can't move a railroad to China or India or anyplace else. We start out with the premise, and I can't think of a more sound premise, that there will be more people in this country, 10, 20, 30 years from now. They will be moving more and more goods back and forth to each other. And you have the most environmentally friendly and the most cost-efficient way of doing that on the railroads. The Burlington Northern last year moved -- on average it moved a ton of freight, 470 miles on one gallon of diesel. That is far, far more efficient than what takes place over the highways. You have the situation where overall they use 1/3 less fuel, they put far fewer pollutants into the atmosphere than trucks will. One train will supplant 280 trucks are so on the road. So the rails are in tune with the future. I like the West. I like the 30-some-thousand miles of roadway that Burlington has. And, you know, if this country has a poor future, the rails have a poor future. I'm willing to bet a lot of money, 34 billion to be specific -- [LAUGHTER] -- on the fact that 10 years from now, 20 years from now, 50 years from now, there will be more and more goods being moved by rail and better for the country and it will be better for the shareholders of the Burlington Northern.

BECKY: OK. [APPLAUSE] Another question.

QUESTION: Hi. My name is Josh Porter. I'm a first-year from North Reading, Massachusetts. It's an honor to have you both here. So we just went through the worst financial crisis of hopefully all of our lifetime. And I know it keeps a lot of Americans up at night, you know, worrying about their future. What, if anything, keeps either of you up at night?

BUFFETT: I try to live my life so nothing keeps me up at night. [APPLAUSE] I don't like to sound, you know, like a mortician during an epidemic or anything, but last fall was really quite exciting for me. [LAUGHTER] I don't wish it on anybody, but there were things being offered. There are opportunities for us to do things that didn't exist a year or two earlier. So I really don't -- I don't want to be in a position where I am leveraged or something of the sort that does keep me up at night. I did not worry about the ultimate survival of our economic system. We were messed up. Wasn't any question about that. But the plants haven't gone away. The cornfields haven't gone away. The talent of the American people hasn't gone away. The innovativeness of the next Bill Gates hasn't gone away. This country was going to do fine. I knew that. We just had to get things straightened out. And we're well on the way to having that happen.

BECKY: Bill, you mentioned -- [APPLAUSE] You mentioned before that you called Warren and he said, ‘Yeah, we should maybe be a little worried.’ Did you stay up late that night worrying about it?

GATES: No. The financial system, fortunately, good leadership has a lot of self-correction built into it. I think there are a few things that could surprise us that are negative. You know, big terrorist event sometime in the next 20 years, that would be a big negative. And a pandemic, which we're actually having in terms of the rate of spread of a new flu, one right now. And fortunately, its actual impact is very modest, way less than any such thing. So you have to keep your eye out for a few outliers like that. Those are the two that I would point to. But overwhelmingly, the rest of the system, you know, there is self-correction built into it. The long-term thing that I don't lose sleep over but I worry about is that we do have our education system, particularly the K through 12 part, not improving as much as we should. And it's an important system for opportunity, it's an important system for the economic strength of the country, and since it hasn't improved that much, that's a bit scary and needs a lot more attention.

BUFFETT: Becky, if you had a wonderful farm and you knew the next 50 years there would be five droughts but there would be 45 good years, I mean, you would not become paralyzed thinking about the five drought years. You would recognize that you've got a system that works very well over time, and that's our American economic system.

BECKY: Since we just had the drought year, does that make it less likely for the --

BUFFETT: No. If you study statistics at Columbia, you'd recognize that -- [APPLAUSE]


BECKY: OK. Let's get to another question. Right back here.

QUESTION: I'm Peter Lawrence, first-year student from Columbia. And, first of all, thank you both so much for coming here. Mr. Buffett, the recent runup in the market has been historic. And it seems that many people question the sustainability of the current price level. Do you think the rally is for real?

BUFFETT: What's going to happen tomorrow, huh? [APPLAUSE] Let me give you an illustration. I bought my first stock in 1942. I was 11. I had been dillydallying up until then. I got serious. [LAUGHTER] What do you think the best year for the market has been since 1942? Best calendar year from 1942 to the present time. Well, there's no reason for you to know the answer. The answer is 1954. In 1954, the Dow … dividends was up 50%. Now if you look at 1954, we were in a recession a good bit of that time. The recession started in July of '53. Unemployment peaked in September of '54. So until November of '54 you hadn't seen an uptick in the employment figure. And the unemployment figure more than doubled during that period. It was the best year there was for the market. So it's a terrible mistake to look at what's going on in the economy today and then decide whether to buy or sell stocks based on it. You should decide whether to buy or sell stocks based on how much you're getting for your money, long-term value you're getting for your money at any given time. And next week doesn't make any difference because next week, next week is going to be a week further away. And the important thing is to have the right long-term outlook, evaluate the businesses you are buying. And then a terrible market or a terrible economy is your friend. I don't care, in making a purchase of the Burlington Northern, I don't care whether next week, or next month or even next year there is a big revival in car loadings or any of that sort of thing. A period like this gives me a chance to do things. It's silly to wait. I wrote an article. If you wait until you see the robin, spring will be over.


BECKY: But at the same time -- [APPLAUSE] Warren, you have repeatedly said over the last year that investing in American areas is a bet on the future of America. But you have also invested overseas, companies like BYD. You both spent some time in China. Are there more opportunities overseas or right here in America?

BUFFETT: I see more opportunity in the United States. We're the biggest economy and we're looking for big deals. But I am delighted to find something, you know, whether it's in China or whether it's in Israel, like Iscar or whatever it may be. There are more opportunities in the United States than anyplace else.

BECKY: Bill, you agree with that?

GATES: Well, yes. The U.S. benefits as the globe benefits. You're not going to have a case where the rest of the world does poorly and the U.S. does well. Our fate is tied to open trade, innovation everywhere. You know, even the Burlington, some of the stuff that's on those railroads might come from other countries.

BUFFETT: I hope so.

GATES: It's exciting to see what's going on in China. It's great for us. If we had a choice for all the people in China to be as rich as we are versus be as poor as they were back in 1979, we'd be way better off to say, you know, let's have them be consumers and inventors just like we are. They are a long ways away from that. But they are a large enough population that great things are happening there. And, you know, many countries that we thought of as basket cases and we sent lots of aid to, like Brazil or Mexico or Thailand, are now big contributors. So it's good for the world that it's not as dependent just on the U.S. But the U.S. is where the energy revolution is likely to happen, the IT revolution will continue. We are expected to lead the way.

BECKY: All right. We're going to be back with another question in just a moment. [APPLAUSE] And by the way, if you have the chance, how would you like to have Warren Buffett or Bill Gates as your career counselor? Well, we're going to have that when we come right back. [APPLAUSE]


BECKY: Welcome back, everybody. We have more questions for Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. And we are running through them, but let's keep them going. Got a question right over here.

QUESTION: My name is Erica Braley and I am a second-year student. My question is for Mr. Gates. What is the most important thing you do every day?

GATES: Hmmm. [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE] Well, I do a lot of variety. I think reading a lot, you know, and continuing to learn. I'm in a lot of new areas in the Foundation, education, health. And I love reading a lot. So I think, you know, arming myself with that knowledge and sitting down with people who live the topic and brainstorming with them, that's what helps me back the right people and make sure I know what's going on. So I guess I'd say learning is what is the key thing. [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: What was that? Let's get to another question.

QUESTION: Mr. Buffett, Mr. Gates, thank you for being here today. My name is Justin Heyman, I'm a second-year MBA, as I get ready to graduate, I was wondering, what's the one thing that your MBA didn't prepare you for when you got out into the real world?

BUFFETT: Well, I was -- it prepared me very well, not the whole degree, but specific professors prepared me very well for what I wanted to go into. I knew I was interested in investing, like I say, from the time I was six or seven years of age. So I was lucky that I found what turned me on early on. And I had these two marvelous professors here at Columbia that just being around -- I had read all the stuff they had written. So it wasn't I was acquiring lots of incremental knowledge but I was getting inspired. They were terrific for me. They treated me like a son. They would take me out to dinner. Ben Graham did the same thing for me. So it gave me confidence in myself. It just propelled me into a field I already love with a terrific tailwind from these professors that believed in me. [APPLAUSE] But let me add one point because -- to the MBA situation. Right now, I would pay $100,000 for 10% of the future earnings of any of you. So anybody that wants to see me after this is over -- [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE] If that's true, you are a million-dollar asset right now, right, if 10% of you is worth 100,000? You could improve -- many of you, and I certainly could have when I got out, just in terms of learning communication skills. You know, it's not something that is taught. I actually went to a Dale Carnegie course later on in terms of public speaking. But if you improve your value 50% by having better communication skills, that's another $500,000 in terms of capital value. See me after the class and I'll pay you 150-thousand. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Warren, you bring up your time here. I don't know if you can see the monitors back here, but we did take a look at your yearbook and steal your picture from 1951 year.

BUFFETT: Uh-oh.


QUICK: I think we have a picture in the back. There you are. [APPLAUSE]

BUFFETT: I don't think I'd pay $100,000 for 10% of that guy. [LAUGHTER]

BECKY: Another question right here.

BUFFETT: Hi. My name is Oleg Cheesh. I'm a second-year MBA student here. My question is for Mr. Gates. You obviously worked very hard to get to where you are. Could you reflect on what role pure luck played in your success?

GATES: Well, I was lucky in many ways. I was lucky to be born with certain skills. I was lucky to have parents that created an environment where they shared what they were working on and let me buy as many books as I wanted to. And I was lucky in terms of the timing. The invention of the microprocessor was something profound. And it turned out only if you were kind of young and looking at that could you appreciate what it meant. And then I had been obsessed with writing software. It turned out that was the key missing thing that would allow the microprocessor to have this incredible impact. So in timing and skill set, in some of the people I was lucky enough to meet, you know, meeting Warren and talking to him, learning from him, it is unusual to have so much luck in one life, I think. But it's been a major factor in what I have been able to do.

BECKY: All right. Another question right here.

QUESTION: Hello, my name is Ugin Quinn, I'm from Deerfield, Illinois. And I'm a first-year student at Columbia Business School. I'd like to direct my question to both Mr. Buffett and Mr. Gates. In the context of both your professional relationship and unique friendship, what do you admire most about each other?

BECKY: OK. Who wants to take that one first? [LAUGHTER]

BUFFETT: My athletic ability. Say that. [APPLAUSE] Well, I would say what I really most admire about Bill is the view he has about what he should do with the wealth he's accumulated. I mean, as he said, he was very lucky. He was born in the right country, at the right time, with the right wiring and all of that sort of thing. In the end, he knows he's a beneficiary of a terrific society, and not everybody gets the long straws like he and I did. So he is -- and he has this view that every human life worldwide is the equivalent of every other human life, and he's backing it up not only with money, but backing it up with his time. And his wife, Melinda, is backing it up with her time. And they are really going to spend, you know, the last half of their lives or so using both money, talent, energy, imagination, all improving the lives of 6.5 billion people around the world. That's what I admire the most. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Bill.

GATES: With Warren, there are a lot of things you could pick, you know, his integrity as an example for the world. His sense of humor. But I think I'd pick his desire to teach, his desire to teach things that are complex and put them in a simple form so that people can understand and get the benefit of all his experience, all his models of how the world works. He loves to teach. And he does it meeting with students. He does it in his annual newsletter. He does it when he's talking to me on the phone. It's a real gift that I admire incredibly. [APPLAUSE]


BECKY: Let's take another question right here.

QUESTION: Mr. Buffett, Mr. Gates, thank you for being here tonight. I am Ibrahim Dolly, first year here at Columbia. I came from Portugal. I have a question for both of you. You both knew early in your careers what you wanted to do in your life. What advice do you have for those of us who are a little bit unclear?

GATES: Well, finding the thing that you are passionate about and that you are good at can sometimes take a period of years. I think Warren and I were lucky we kind of ran into it. I wasn't even sure it was software. I was kind of obsessed with it but then it wasn't clear it could be a career. When that happened, it was great. I think most other people get into their 20s and have to try out some different experiences. And some things will expose you to a lot of different businesses, a lot of different work opportunities. And I think you can make your first few jobs optimized for getting that exposure. And then when you want it, see the thing that you want to be fanatical about and just jump on to that.

BECKY: All right.

BUFFETT: First of all, I'd say marry the right person. [LAUGHTER] And I'm serious about that. [APPLAUSE] It will make more difference in your life. It will change your aspiration, all kind of things. It's enormously important who you marry. Beyond that, I would say that do what you would do if you were in my position, where the money means nothing to you. At 79, ... I work every day. And it's what I want to do more than anything else in the world. The closer you can come to that early on in your life, you know the more fun you're going to have in life and really the better you're going to do. So don't be driven where you think the last dollar is presently or anything of that sort. And then also go to work, if possible, for an organization or an individual that you admire. I mean I offered to go to work for Ben Graham because there was nobody I admired more in the business than him. I didn't care what he paid me. When he finally did hire me in 1954, I moved from Omaha to New York and I didn't know what I was getting paid until I got my first paycheck. But I knew I wanted to work for Ben Graham. And I knew I would jump out of bed every morning and be excited about what I would do and I would go home at night smarter than I was in the morning. Go to work at a job that turns you on and a person that turns you on and institution. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Stay right here. We will be right back.


BECKY: All right. Class continues, everybody. We are back with the two greatest capitalists out there with Investing 101, back to more students’ questions. Why don't we start right here?

QUESTION: My name is Adam Van Dam and I'm a first-year student here. This question is for Mr. Buffett. If the Burlington Northern acquisition is any indication of your long-term buy and hold forever investment philosophy, I am wondering if the financial crisis has impacted that philosophy or your investment process in any way?

BUFFETT: No. It hasn't changed at all. We like products like this. How is this for shameless products? [APPLAUSE] This started in 1886. It's gone through all of these events. And the end will be 1.6 billion eight-ounce servings of Coca-Cola products come today and there will be more next year. We want to be in business with a durable competitive advantage with managements we like and trust and do them at a price we like. It hasn't changed a 1/10 of a degree. Incidentally, we own Fruit of the Loom, too, but I'm not going to do a product. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: OK. Our next question right here.

QUESTION: Hi, I'm Brian Seedabalker. I'm a second-year student. Mr. Buffett, it's great to see you again. I was on the trip to Omaha last month. Thank you for hosting us. My question is, how would you recommend an individual investor who follows the Graham and Dodd philosophy to allocate their capital today?

BUFFETT: Well, it depends whether they are going to be an active investor. Graham distinguished between the defensive and the enterprising and that. So if you are going to spend a lot of time on investment, you know I just advise looking at as many things as possible and you will find some bargains. And when you find them, you have to act. It doesn't -- it hasn't changed at all since I was here in 1950, 1951. And it won't change the rest of my life. You start turning pages. When I got out of school, I turned every page in Moody's 10,000-some pages twice, looking for companies. And you have to find them yourself. The world isn't going to tell you about great deals. You have to find them yourself. And that takes a fair amount of time. So if you are not going to do that, if you are just going to be a passive investor, then I just advise an index fund more consistently over a long period of time. The one thing I will tell you is the worst investment you can have is cash. Everybody is talking about cash being king and all that sort of thing. Most of you don't look like you are overburdened with cash anyway. [LAUGHTER] Cash is going to become worth less over time. But good businesses are going to become worth more over time. And you don't want to pay too much for them so you have to have some discipline about what you pay. But the thing to do is find a good business and stick with it.

BECKY: Does that mean you think we are through the roughest times? You had always kept the cash word around, too.

BUFFETT: We always keep enough cash around so I feel very comfortable and don't worry about sleeping at night. But it's not because I like cash as an investment. Cash is a bad investment over time. But you always want to have enough so that nobody else can determine your future essentially. The worst -- the financial panic is behind us. The economic spillout which came to some extent from that financial panic is still with us. It will end. I don't know if it will end tomorrow or next week or next month. Or maybe a year. But it won't go on forever. And to sit around and try and pick the bottom, people were trying to do that last March and the bottom hadn't come in unemployment and the bottom hadn't come in business but the bottom had come in stocks. Don't pass up something that's attractive today because you think you will find something way more attractive tomorrow.


BECKY: Another question right here.

QUESTION: Mr. Buffett and Mr. Gates, my name is Antionette Genevieve. I am a first-year executive MBA student. And I actually work at Goldman Sachs, so thank you for your investment. [APPLAUSE]


BUFFETT: Why aren't you at work? [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE]

QUESTION: My question to you is I'd like both of your thoughts on the investment of alternative energy as for developing our economy and getting it back on track.

BECKY: Bill, you touched on this earlier.

BILL: Well, there are many, many ideas. And there's enough that we can say most of them will turn out to be dead ends. You know, the solar-thermal, solar-electric, nuclear is going to go through some of the revival and see if it can solve some of its cost challenges. As a country, we want to make sure all of those get lots of R&D and regulatory enablement because one of them is going to give us much cheaper power without causing any problem. We don't know which one it is. And we don't have quite as much R&D going into those things as I'd like to see. We have quite a bit, but I think the government policies could drive for more. But it is one of these areas that is somewhat faddish in nature. When you have a lot of energy focusing on a field, the amount of money that goes in is very large. And the overall return on capital is often quite large. The car industry in its heyday was a disaster. The airline industry, even the software industry because people don't remember all the non-Microsofts that don't exist until today. When something is hot, you get kind of a bubble. So energy, you're going to have to be a bit careful to make sure it's one that's really got its cost structure in line and it's not just being pushed along by subsidies and there will be scientific surprises. So a very hot area, but not necessarily a good area for investment.

BECKY: All right. Why don't we leave it there for now? When we come back, we will have more with Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. [APPLAUSE] We'll be talking about leadership and President Obama right after this break. [APPLAUSE]



BECKY: All right. Welcome back, everybody. We are at Columbia University. And right now we're going straight to the top of Columbia Business School. We are joined by Dean Hubbard. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] Glenn Hubbard, by the way, is not only the head of the Business School here, he also happened to serve at the White House where he was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors. So this is a man who knows not only about what's happening in the economy, but also what's happening with these students. You talk to them all the time. What's the question that you'd like to pose to Mr. Gates and Mr. Buffett?

HUBBARD: Thanks, Becky, and thanks to both of you for being here today. And, Warren, welcome home.

BUFFETT: Thank you. [APPLAUSE]

HUBBARD: Warren, one thing you said years ago that's always stuck with me is you never know who is swimming naked until the tide goes out. And that, of course, says maybe there's some value in knowing when it's going to be low tide. It also says there's value in knowing context. How do we develop -- how do we encourage business leaders who understand context and connect the dots?

BUFFETT: Well, I think they have learned a lot about that in the last year. Some never learn, you know. At Berkshire, we have actually 70-some managers. I think most of them are a fair amount smarter than they were 15 months ago but they were plenty smart to go in. But, you know, I think that what I learned from a Ben Graham, who came up here every Thursday afternoon. He didn't need to do it, you know. He donated whatever he got paid back to the school and all of that. But having sound principles takes you through everything. And the bedrock principles that really I learned from Graham and Dodd, I haven't had to do anything with them. They take me through good periods. They take me through bad periods. In the end, I don't worry about them because I know they work.


BECKY: Bill, what do you think is the most important character for a business leader to have?

GATES: Well, it's surprising that the fundamentals of business are pretty straightforward, you know. You try to take more in income than you spend in cost. That's a pretty straightforward subtraction. But it's surprising in terms of projecting out into the years ahead that, you know, are we making the right investments, are we gaining on the competition, are we making it a little bit harder for people to replace what we're doing? That kind of common sense, I guess you've got to develop it through experience. And I think it's neat if you are young and you can see that in a small scale and be hands on with it because a lot of people who start with large businesses may have a hard time with it. So, you know, the basics are pretty straightforward. Learning how it works and doesn't work in a variety of industries, by reading a lot, I think that's something that comes with time and a business school is an intense period where you can get ahead of the game.

BUFFETT: I send one message out every year and a half or two years. They get one letter from me every couple of years. And basically it says, run this business like it's the only business that your family can own for the next 100 years. You can't sell it. But every year don't measure it by the earnings in the quarter that year. Measure it by whether the moat around that business, what gives it competitive advantage over time has widened or narrowed. If you keep doing that for 100 years, it's going to work out very well. Then I tell them basically if the reason for doing something is everybody else is doing it, it's not good enough. If you have to use that as a reason, forget it. You don't have a good reason for doing something. Never use that.


BECKY: Let's get to some student questions. [APPLAUSE]

QUESTION: Mr. Buffett, Mr. Gates, it is absolutely fantastic having you here. Thanks a lot. My name is Kata Cafunka. I am a second-year MBA student here at Columbia. Actually, my question is really related to what you were asking. Many of us and many people in general aspire to become somebody like you. But actually only a few people got that height, right? So what do you think were the major qualities that you have that distinguish you from the majority?

BECKY: All right. Bill, Warren, what makes you stand out from the crowd?

BUFFETT: It's always interesting when Bill and I appear together, they don't figure they can do what Bill does, but they know they can do what I do. [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE] We did both have a passion. We were doing what we did because we loved it. We weren't doing it to get rich. We probably felt if we did it well, we would get rich. But we'd have done it, you know, if somebody was slipping bread in under the door, you know, to keep us going. And so I think that passion for it is enormously important. I was lucky enough to have a couple of great teachers, particularly one great teacher. I had a great teacher in life in my father. But I had another great teacher in terms of profession in terms of Ben Graham. I was lucky enough to get the right foundation very early on. And then basically I didn't listen to anybody else. I just look in the mirror every morning and the mirror always agrees with me. And I go out and do what I believe I should be doing. And I'm not influenced by what other people think.

BECKY: All right. We'll get to Bill's answer on this in just a minute. [APPLAUSE] Bill Gates and Warren Buffett right after this break.


BECKY: All right. Welcome back, everybody. Welcome back to class. We have left that last break waiting for an answer from Bill Gates. Bill, if you had to pick one thing that makes you stand out from everyone else, what would that be?

GATES: Well, we talked about some of the basics, having great people around you, reading a lot, thinking long-term. I also think, though, there become a few magic moments where you have to have confidence in yourself. You know, Warren when he set off on his own, he could have gone and taken a job as an analyst somewhere. But he knew that he had the skill, that he was going to raise money and have his own partnership. When I dropped out of Harvard and said to my friends, ‘Come work for me,’ there was a certain kind of brass self-confidence in that. You have a few moments like that where trusting yourself and saying yes, this can come together -- you have to seize on those because not many come along.

BECKY: All right. Great advice. Believe in yourself. Guys, we're going to try and go into a cram session and get in some answers pretty rapid fire. Let's get right back here. We have a question.

QUESTION: My name is Nikki Shelton from Roseville, New York. I'm a second-year student here at the school. First, I just want to thank you guys for being great philanthropists. You guys have done a great job in the world. [APPLAUSE] And my question is for Mr. Buffett. You recently made a huge contribution to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. If you can talk to us a little bit about what your reasoning was and how you'd like to see those funds used.

BUFFETT: Well, I wouldn't have given it to them unless I was 100% in sync with their objective, which is do the most good for the most people, wherever they may be, male or female, whatever their color, whatever their religion or so on. They believe every human life is equal to every other one. I am very good at making money. If you read what Adam Smith wrote in 1776 about specialization of labor, you know, he said if you need to deliver a baby, don't try to learn to do it yourself. Get an obstetrician. So Bill and Melinda will be better and my children who will also have foundations will be better at doing it than I would be. And that's fine. I'll work at what I'm good at and I'll let them do it. And they are doing it 100% in accord with my wishes.


BECKY: Another question right here.

QUESTION: Mr. Buffett and Mr. Gates, welcome to Columbia Business School. My name is Chris. I'm from Pennsylvania and I'm a first-year MBA student. My question is, who have been some of your most important mentors? And what lessons have you learned from them?

BECKY: Bill.

GATES: Well, I benefited from my dad and mom who set a great example. My dad was a lawyer and shared what he was doing at work. I have had some business partners that we have learned together, Steve Balmer in particular. And then I pick Warren as somebody I have learned an immense amount from, just hearing his stories of how he dealt with tough situations, how he thought long-term, how he models the world. If you get a chance to spend time with people like that, it's fantastic.

BECKY: All right. We will be right back. Stay right here.


BECKY: All right. Ready? Welcome back, everybody. This is real crunch time. Let's get right to it. You got it question?

QUESTION: Yeah. Welcome. My name is Steven Matthews. I am in the executive Business School here. Thanks for coming here. My question is on Apple . Mr. Gates, if you could just comment and tell us what your thoughts are on the job Steve Jobs has done as the CEO of Apple. [LAUGHTER]

GATES: Well, he's done a fantastic job. And Apple is in a bit of a different business where they make hardware and software together. But when Steve was coming back to Apple, which was actually through an acquisition of NeXT that he ran, Apple was in very tough shape. In fact, most likely, it wasn't going to survive. And he brought in a team. He brought in inspiration about great products and design that's made Apple back into being an incredible force in doing good things. And it's, you know, great to have competitors like that. We write software for Apple, Microsoft does. They compete with Apple. But he, of all the leaders in the industry that I have worked with, he showed more inspiration and he saved the company.

BECKY: OK. Tag, you're it.

QUESTION: Thank you. My name is Michael. I'm a first year MBA student. The question is for Mr. Gates. I was wondering if you think Google at all resembles Microsoft during Microsoft's early years.

GATES: Well, they have some of the same problems we had. [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE] It's another fine competitor. They are hiring a lot of smart people. They have gotten into the lead position in search, which is incredibly profitable to be number one in that. They may get a little competition as time goes forward. But they are a great example of what can happen, you know, two young guys who got together, pursued an idea and created a success that's absolutely gigantic. And we all, you know, hopefully use search engines, maybe a variety. [LAUGHTER] And we benefit from that.


BECKY: Right here.

QUESTION: Hi, I'm Josh Austin. I'm a second-year MBA student. My question is for you, Mr. Buffett. Value investors, such as yourself, believe that fundamental analysis, deep fundamental analysis is critical to intelligent investing. However, you have said several times in the past that you have made very rapid capital allocation decisions, sometimes in less than five minutes. I was wondering exactly which data gave you confidence in your decision.

BUFFETT: Well, that's 50 years of preparation and five (minutes) of decision making. [APPLAUSE]

BECKY: Can you just look at the spreadsheet? Can you look at an annual report and make a decision like that?

BUFFETT: Yeah. Sometimes I can. Just take Coca-Cola, for example. I sampled the product for 60 years and then I saw a couple of key ingredients, you know, that essentially tipped the scale in terms of buying it back in 1988. But the good big decisions, they don't take any time at all. If they take time, you're in trouble.

BECKY: All right. We will have more with Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, when we come right back.


BECKY: All right. Welcome back, everybody. Gentlemen, last question today. If America was a stock, would you buy it? Bill.

GATES: You bet.

BECKY: Warren.

BUFFETT: On margin. [LAUGHTER]

BECKY: Gentlemen, we want to thank you very much for your time. You've been wonderful. Bill, Warren, we really appreciate it. Let's give them a big round of applause, guys. [APPLAUSE] And we want to thank all of you, too. Columbia University, the Business School, Dean Hubbard, thank you, guys. We really appreciate it. It's been fantastic. That does it for us today. I'm Becky Quick, and if you want to watch this, you can go to CNBC.com and we will see you back here very soon.




^O^

5 Nov 2009

谢谢三月风大大


俩个月前, 基于三月风大大的
"假定当前沪指2800点时,股民手中的钱都不流入楼市,当沪指上涨到3700点上涨32%时".

少量买进HKCEI指数, 希望有关连地上升,

决定再十一前, 和 沪指到3600,任一条件 出现 时 即卖出.

沪指过山车回到2800..

十一前几天, 卖出HKCEI, +17%.虽有赚,心理却很 糊涂...

不管怎么说, 谢谢三月风大大!




^O^